New Delhi:( 26/02/2019) On February 26, Supreme court of India while hearing Ayodhya title suit case said that the top court will pass an order on March 5 on issue whether Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute be referred to court-appointed mediator.
The Supreme Court suggested that even if there is 1 per cent chance, mediation should be done.
CJI asks Muslim parties as to how much time would be needed to examine translations; “8-12 weeks”, replies Dhavan.
Orders were passed to examine UP govt translations and now two years later they raise objections to it, says Vaidyanathan
“We are not going to waste our time if disputes are going to be raised over translation of documents”, says CJI
SC asks parties to show order by which they had agreed to translated documents filed by UP govt.
Sr Adv C S Vaidyanathan for Ram Lalla says translations were verified and accepted by all parties in December 2017.
Advocate Dhavan says he will have to check veracity of translated documents.
Dispute is arising between parties over translation of documents, says CJI.
Senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan, representing a Muslim party, says he is yet to examine translation of documents
SC says it can proceed with hearing if there is consensus with regard to translation of documents.
If translations of documents are now acceptable to all, parties cannot contest translations once proceedings begin, says SC.
CJI asks lawyers of both sides to peruse the report of Secretary General of SC on status of documents.
SC refers to copies of report filed by Secretary General on status of documents, sealed records of case.
