Report on the Banking Sector Outlook by Moody’s & ICRA.

On Jan 9, 2017

Enclosed please find a Report on the Banking Sector Outlook by Moody’s & ICRA. Have enclosed key talk points below for your quick reference.

· Subdued prospects for India’s banks, with both identifying asset deterioration as a key challenge over the medium term

· According to Ms. Alka Anbarasu, Moody’s Vice President and Senior Analyst, “Asset quality will remain a negative driver of the credit profiles of most rated Indian banks and the stock ofimpaired loans. Non-performing loans (NPLs) and standard restructured loans will still rise during the horizon of our outlook.”

· According to ICRA, A muted level of credit off-take — on the back of weak demand, increasing competition and greater disintermediation — will continue to exert downward pressure on lending rates.

· Such a development will be partly offset by the fall in the cost of funds, but stubbornly high operating expense levels and elevated credit costs will continue to dent profitability matrices for the banks,” says Karthik Srinivasan, an ICRA Senior Vice President.

· As on September 30, 2016, while all the public sector banks had met the minimum common equity tier 1 (CET 1) requirement of 6.75% applicable by March 2017, six also reported Tier 1 capital of less than 8.25%, the regulatory minimum. Furthermore, the overall capitalization levels of most of the public sector banks remains moderate to weak, given that they need to attain the regulatory minimum Tier 1requirement of 9.5% by March 2019.

· The Indian government’s current plan of infusing INR450 billion during FY2017-FY2019 — of which INR164.14billion have been already infused in the current year — is below ICRA’s estimates of capital requirements ofINR1,500-1,800 billion until FY2017-FY2019.

· According to ICRA, of this total of INR1,500-1,800 billion, the banks can raise around INR800-950 billion by issuing AT1 instruments, with public sector banks having issued AT1 aggregating to around INR200 billion in, the current year.

Announcement: Moody’s and ICRA: Indian banks’ weak asset quality continues to pressure profitability and capitalization profile

Global Credit Research – 09 Jan 201f

Singapore, January 09, 2017 — Moody’s Investors Service and its Indian affiliate, ICRA Limited, see subdued prospects for India’s banks, with both identifying asset deterioration as a key challenge over the medium term.

“Asset quality will remain a negative driver of the credit profiles of most rated Indian banks and the stock ofimpaired loans. Non-performing loans (NPLs) and standard restructured loans will still rise during the horizon of our outlook,” says Alka Anbarasu, a Moody’s Vice President and Senior Analyst.

ccording to Moody’s, such pressure on asset quality largely reflects the system’s legacy problems, as relating to the strong credit growth seen in 2009-2012, when the investment plans of Indian corporates rose significantly.

Nevertheless, aside from these legacy issues, the underlying asset trend for Indian banks will be stable because of a generally supportive operating environment. While corporate balance sheets stay weak, a further deterioration in key credit metrics such as debt/equity and interest coverage ratios has been arrested.

“We expect the pace of deterioration in asset quality over the next 12-18 months should be lower than what was seen over the last five years, and especially compared to FY2016, even as we consider those remaining problem loans which have not been recognized as such in several large accounts,” says Anbarasu.

In this context, Moody’s also considers the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) asset quality review (AQR) in 2015as a particularly important catalyst in pushing banks to recognize some large accounts as being impaired. As aresult, Moody’s now estimates that the “true” level of impaired loans for Indian banks to be around 1-1.5percentage points higher than the latest reported numbers.

Given the magnitude of stressed assets in the system, Moody’s expects the banks to increase their focus on resolving some of the large problem accounts.

“In this regard, we expect an increased pace of debt restructuring under the various schemes offered by the RBI, including the scheme for the sustainable structuring of stressed assets (S4A), strategic debt restructuring(SDR) and the 5:25 scheme,” says Anbarasu. “Nevertheless, weak reserving levels and continued pressure on profitability will limit the ability of the banks to proactively resolve problem assets under these schemes.”

From ICRA’s viewpoint, a muted level of credit off-take — on the back of weak demand, increasing competition and greater disintermediation — will continue to exert downward pressure on lending rates.

“Such a development will be partly offset by the fall in the cost of funds, but stubbornly high operating expense levels and elevated credit costs will continue to dent profitability matrices for the banks,” says Karthik Srinivasan, an ICRA Senior Vice President.

“And while bank profitability is not expected to be as weak as the levels seen in FY2016, the weakness in asset quality will continue to drag on profitability indicators, with return on equity remaining in the single digits for FY2017 and FY2018,” says Srinivasan.

ICRA further notes that, as of September 30, 2016, while all the public sector banks had met the minimum common equity tier 1 (CET 1) requirement of 6.75% applicable by March 2017, six also reported Tier 1 capital of less than 8.25%, the regulatory minimum. Furthermore, the overall capitalization levels of most of the public sector banks remains moderate to weak, given that they need to attain the regulatory minimum Tier 1requirement of 9.5% by March 2019.

The Indian government’s current plan of infusing INR450 billion during FY2017-FY2019 — of which INR164.14billion have been already infused in the current year — is below ICRA’s estimates of capital requirements ofINR1,500-1,800 billion until FY2017-FY2019.According to ICRA, of this total of INR1,500-1,800 billion, the banks can raise around INR800-950 billion by issuing AT1 instruments, with public sector banks having issued AT1 aggregating to around INR200 billion in, the current year.

ICRA believes that the continued level of investor appetite will remain the key factor determining future AT1issuances, as the risk of servicing the coupon payments on these bonds has increased considerably,especially for the weaker public sector banks. This is because substantial losses in this sector in the last fewquarters have significantly depleted revenue reserves.

In this context, the government may need to materially increase the quantum of capital infusions into the public sector banks, in view of the fact that investor appetite for common equity remains subdued, as evidenced by weak share price multiples.

This publication does not announce a credit rating action. For any credit ratings referenced in this publication ,please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the most updated credit ratingaction information and rating history.

Alka Anbaras_ Vice President – Senior Analysm Financial Institutions GrouX Moody’s Investors Service Singapore Pte. Ltd Z 50 Raffles Place #23-0i Singapore Land ToweZ Singapore 4862r Singapor[ JOURNALISTS: (852) 3758 -135a SUBSCRIBERS: (852) 3551-307e

Gene FanV Associate Managing DirectoZ Financial Institutions GrouX JOURNALISTS: (852) 3758 -135a SUBSCRIBERS: (852) 3551-307e

Releasing Officep Moody’s Investors Service Singapore Pte. LtdZ 50 Raffles Place #23-0i Singapore Land ToweZ Singapore 4862r Singapore[ JOURNALISTS: (852) 3758 -135a SUBSCRIBERS: (852) 3551-307e

CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY’S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGSAFFILIATES (“MIS”) ARE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDITRISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, ANDMOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVEFUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKESECURITIES. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEETITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATEDFINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANYOTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, ORPRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’SPUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’SPUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT
PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDITRISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC.CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDEINVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONSARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLDPARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONSCOMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR.MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WITH THEEXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKEITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FORPURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.]

MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIN INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USs MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISIONZ IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER.]

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO\ COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISs REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED\ REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, I] WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSO] WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT.]

All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate anh reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, alp information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY’S adopts all necessar` measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sourcej MOODY’S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However\ MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information receiveh in the rating process or in preparing the Moody’s publications.]

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives\ licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, oZ incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein oZ the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees\ agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses oZ damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damag[ arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned b` MOODY’S.]

To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives\ licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to an` person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or an` other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or an` contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents\ representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or th[ use of or inability to use any such information.]

NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS\ MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHEu OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNEu WHATSOEVER.]

Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s CorporatioU (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds\ debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have\ prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and ratinV services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintaiU policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS’s ratings and rating processes. InformatioU regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entitiej who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of mor[ than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporat[ Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”]

Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the AustraliaU Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 39b 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (aj applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of sectioU 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represenm to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and tham neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents tY “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is aU opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer oZ any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investorj to use MOODY’S credit ratings or publications when making an investment decision. If in doubt you shoulh contact your financial or other professional adviser.]

Additional terms for Japan only: Moody’s Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiar` of Moody’s Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owneh subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary oo MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credim ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by aU entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatmenm under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Servicej Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively.]

MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate anh municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (aj applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) foZ appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000.]

MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements.]

Report on the Banking Sector Outlook by Moody’s & ICRA.